7th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Fall Symposium: (Panel 1) The Last Private Place

course

PROGRAM INFO

  • Available Until 4/1/2028
  • Class Time 1:00 PM PT
  • Duration 60 min.
  • Format On-Demand
  • Program Code BCLT0089.1
  • CA General CLE Credits: 1.00 hr(s)

Price: FREE

If you have a coupon, please add at checkout

CLE VIEWRegistration Required QUICK VIEWNon-CLE / No Charge
 

DESCRIPTION

7th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Fall Race & Technology Symposium: Being Human in the Age of AI
Panel 1: 
The Last Private Place: Neural Data, Digital Addiction, and the Law of Cognitive Liberty

Program Information | Agenda | Resources | Speaker Bio(s) & Contact Info

Panel Description:

As AI and neurotechnology move ever closer to the mind, this panel asks what it means for the law to protect mental privacy, attention, and cognition. Panelists examine neural-data statutes, addictive product design, and AI companion chatbots through privacy law, consumer-protection authority, and product liability. The central question: when does personalization shade into manipulation, and can existing law protect the user’s inner life?

Speakers

Matthew Lawrence, Emory University Law School

Tracy Shapiro, Wilson Sonsini

Francis Shen, Minnesota Law School

Moderator

Vincent Joralemon, Life Sciences & Competition Center, BCLT, UC Berkeley Law

 

Symposium Description:

Being Human in the Age of AI, a symposium exploring how artificial intelligence is reshaping the law’s most basic assumptions about the human person — from the privacy of the mind to the boundaries of legal responsibility. Across four panels, we traced an arc from the innermost self outward: how neurotechnology and algorithmic design test the limits of cognitive liberty; how deepfakes and biometric systems unsettle the law of identity; how automated decision-making challenges due process and the right to be heard; and how courts and legislatures are struggling to define what AI fundamentally is. Attendees heard from leading scholars, technologists, and practitioners grappling with these questions in real time, as courts issue rulings, states pass conflicting statutes, and AI companies themselves debate the moral status of the systems they build.